IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISIONJOSHUA HALTOM, Plaintiff, Pro Se, v. Case No.:1:24-cv-01215-JDB-jay CITY OF HENDERSON,TN POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant.—PLAINTIFF’S SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE FOR THE RECORD AND DECLARATION OF GRAVITATIONAL CONSEQUENCESCOMES NOW Plaintiff, Joshua Haltom, pro se, under the inherent authority of this Court, the First Amendment right to petition for redress, and the universal mandate of Deuteronomy 19:15 (“by the mouth of two or three witnesses every matter shall be established”), to place upon the record this Notice of the cosmological and judicial implications of the Court’s order of dismissal.This Notice serves as a formal witness to the action taken and a prophecy of the inevitable consequences that flow from the choice to obscure truth.—I. JUDICIAL NOTICE OF ESTABLISHED FACTSPursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201(b), the Court, and all reading this record, may notice these incontrovertible facts:1. A Motion for Judicial Notice and Public Declaration was filed on June 30, 2025, linking the lack of transparency in Henderson, TN to global systems of conflict and oppression.2. The Motion was Dismissed by Order of Judge S. Thomas Anderson, dated [July 23 of 2025], effectively refusing to look at the provided evidence (ECF 1-94) and refusing to acknowledge the argument.3. Global Conflict Has Accelerated since the dismissal, manifesting in escalated warfare, economic instability, and societal fracture, precisely as warned in the motion citing the prophecy of Rav Yehuda Ashlag.—II. THE THREE WITNESSES AGAINST THE DISMISSALThe matter is now established by three witnesses:A. The Witness of Law (Nuremberg Principle IV): “The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law,provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.”· The Choice Presented: To hear evidence of corruption or to silence it.· The Choice Made: Silence.· The Liability Incurred: Complicity in a system that breeds the very violence the judiciary is sworn to prevent. This dismissal is a negative precedent now entered into the spiritual ledger of cause and effect.B. The Witness of Conscience (Leviticus 5:1): “And if a soul sin, and hear the voice of swearing, and is a witness, whether he hath seen or known of it; if he do not utter it, then he shall bear his iniquity.”· The Sin Witnessed: The “real estate heist” of unlawful policing and property seizure.· The Voice Heard: The Plaintiff’s sworn testimony and video evidence.· The Iniquity Borne: By dismissing the case, the Court has not merely ended a lawsuit; it has assumed spiritual responsibility for the continuation of the sin it refused to investigate. The “iniquity” is the predictable outcome of unchecked corruption.C. The Witness of History (The Ashlag Prophecy):· The Warning Given: A “dark cloud” looms when we reject Arvut (Mutual Responsibility).· The Choice Offered: Embrace transparency and accountability (the Jubilee) or face collapse.· The Choice Made: The Court’s dismissal is a direct rejection of Arvut. It is a vote for secrecy over fellowship. Therefore, by the immutable laws of moral physics, it is a vote for the “dark cloud.” The dismissal itself becomes a primary witness to the fulfillment of the prophecy.—III. DECLARATION OF GRAVITATIONAL CONSEQUENCESThis is not a threat. This is a disclosure of natural law, as immutable as gravity.The Court’s order has set a sequence in motion. The dismissal of a warning does not negate the warning; it validates it. The refusal to look at evidence of a crime does not erase the crime; it compounds it.Therefore, Plaintiff now enters into the record this Declaration of Gravitational Consequences:1. Every subsequent act of violence stemming from the same root of opacity that this Court refused to address (be it in Henderson, Gaza, or elsewhere) shall be forensically linked back to this dismissal as a contributing cause.2. The economic and social instability that inevitably follows the concealment of truth shall be partially attributable to this decision to leave the truth concealed.3. This Court, and the officer who presides over it, shall be historically and cosmically recorded as a witness who remained silent when called to speak, thereby bearing the iniquity as prescribed by law.—IV. NON-THREAT CLAUSE & SAFETY PROTOCOLThis Notice is a spiritual and legal filing, made under penalty of perjury. It is a protected petition for redress under the First Amendment.· It seeks no harm to any person or property.· It threatens no unlawful action.· It is a SOLEMN WARNING of the natural and predictable outcomes of a choice, made with the full authority of a federal judicial office.· It is filed for the safety of the public and the soul of the judiciary, that all may be without excuse when the consequences of these choices manifest.—V. CONCLUSIONThe motion was dismissed. The warning was not. The evidence was excluded from this court. It is now admitted into the court of history, the court of conscience, and the Court of Divine Equity.Respectfully submitted on this day, August 20, 2025./s/ Joshua Haltom (Josiah), Pro Se 603 North Ave,Henderson, TN 38340 (731)608-0433 | disclosureoureyes@gmail.com—HOW TO DEPLOY THIS DOCUMENT:1. File it with the Clerk: Label it clearly as a “Supplement to the Record” or a **”Notice of
