NEW ZEN NEWS π REPORTS
🫨 NO TRUTH TO DISCLOSURE EYES, NOT HERE! 🥶 OK 🙋
🗝️ The 2020’s perfect vision – unity in heralding the year of Jubilee _ 911 @ inside job jokes 😅
🙉 Excuses for Suppressing Truth
- Economic Interests: Media corporations are often driven by profit motives. They may suppress information that could disrupt their advertising revenue, foster negative public sentiment, or upset corporate sponsors. For example, if a story about inequality or corporate malfeasance threatens the interests of major advertisers, a media corporation might choose not to air or publish it.
- Status Quo Maintenance: Maintaining the status quo can be beneficial for media corporations that rely on established structures, including governments and large corporate entities. A willingness to present narratives that align with these interests can help ensure continued access to lucrative markets and audiences.
- Fear of Backlash: Media outlets may fear backlash, including legal repercussions, from powerful entities if they disclose certain uncomfortable truths. This promotes a culture of self-censorship where journalists may avoid potentially damaging stories altogether.
👾 Censorship of Independent Journalism
Independent journalism often faces challenges including:
- Resource Limitations: Independent outlets typically operate with fewer resources than mainstream media, which can limit their reach and impact.
- Platform Suppression: Social media platforms and search engines may censor or de-prioritize content that contradicts mainstream narratives, especially regarding sensitive topics. This is often justified by claims of misinformation or harmful content, effectively silencing dissenting voices.
- Subliminal Social Programming: The concept of subliminal messages refers to subtle cues that can influence public perception. Censorship may occur as a means of controlling these narratives, shaping public opinion to align with broader socio-political agendas.
🕳️ Akashic Records and Censorship
The concept of the Akashic Records proposes that all human experiences and knowledge exist in a collective consciousness. From this perspective, one might argue that knowledge—whether suppressed by media or popular narratives—exists beyond time and is ultimately accountable.
- Existential Philosophy and Accountability: The notion that “there are no permanent erasers” relates to the idea that all actions have consequences. This is supported by theories of phenomenology which suggest that human experiences are interconnected and irretrievable, affecting the future through cause and effect (Heidegger, 1962; Merleau-Ponty, 1962).
- Universality of Truth: While censorship may temporarily obscure certain truths, proponents of the Akashic Records might argue that these truths will eventually emerge, as the universe maintains a balance and truth seeks to surface (Kundalini Yoga philosophy).
🫵 Informational Strategies for Change
- Awareness and Education: Advocating for awareness of independent journalism and its importance in promoting a diverse media ecosystem is vital. Academia supports the role of pluralism in media for encouraging democratic discourse (Curran, 2000).
- Collective Mobilization: Encouraging communities to support independent outlets by subscribing, donating, or sharing their work could help sustain these platforms and resist censorship.
- Engagement with Ethics: Discussing the ethical implications of media practices, and how they affect societal values, can foster discussion on the importance of truth and transparency in journalism (McChesney, 2004).
☄️
In conclusion, while mainstream media might find reasons to suppress uncomfortable truths, the persistence of independent journalism and the philosophical underpinnings of knowledge and accountability suggest that truth is indeed a powerful force that cannot be indefinitely hidden from the collective human consciousness. The challenge remains in fostering a media landscape that values integrity, inclusivity, and authenticity.
Share this content:
